Deposed Governor of Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Sanusi Lamido on
Thursday maintained that the Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria
(FRCN) lacks the statutory powers to investigate him.
In his originating summons on a suit he filed against FRCN and its
executive secretary at a Federal High Court in Lagos, Sanusi accused the
council of bias in its investigations of him, and therefore urged the
court to halt the process.
As contained in the suit — filed by his Senior Advocate of
Nigeria-lawyers, Professor Yemi Osibajo, Dr Kanyinsola Ajayi and Kola
Awodehin — Sanusi requested the court to declare that by constituting
itself into investigating body in the manner contained in newspaper
advertorials of 24 March 2014, FRCN acted ultra vires. Continue ...
He also sought a declaration that the conduct, action, decision and
conclusion in respect of the plaintiff, particularly as it manifested in
a brief note of 7th June 2013 sent to the president, were ultra vires
and contravened the rule of natural justice.
His demands also include a declaration by the court that the
defendants do not have the powers to conduct the purported investigation
as advertised in newspapers, as well as an order restraining the
defendants and their agents in any form from conducting any
investigation, inquiry, hearing or proceedings whatsoever as advertised
in newspapers as the defendants do not have the powers to conduct such
investigation.
He further implored the court to set aside and nullify any report,
conclusion and recommendation based on any purported investigation
conducted as advertised in newspapers.
“The defendants reached conclusions and made far reaching
recommendations without giving Sanusi a fair hearing”, his lawyer, Mr.
Kola Awodein (SAN) said.
“In those conclusions and decisions they have taken, they have
breached his fundamental rights to natural justice, because the
plaintiff was not given any opportunity to defend himself before they
reached those decisions.
“For instance, FRCN wrongly accused Sanusi of misappropriating
N20.2billion in legal and professional fees. Had they given him the
opportunity to defend himself, he would have shown how the money was
spent”.
Responding through a counter-affidavit and preliminary objection
filed and argued on behalf of FRCN by Mr. Adesegun Ajibola (SAN), the
defendants disagreed that the court lacks jurisdiction to hear the suit,
saying the plaintiff has not exhausted the internal mechanism of
resolution of grievances before heading for the court.
“The suit, as presently constituted, is premature, incompetent, consequently the court lacks jurisdiction to hear it”, he said.
Defending the main suit, Ajibola maintained that FRCN, through its
secretary, issued a note addressed to President Goodluck Jonathan,
wherein it expressed its observation on the discrepancies it noticed in
the audited financial statement and explanatory note of the CBN.
“Consequently, part of its recommendation was that there was need for
thorough investigation of the activities of the CBN”, he went on.
“The investigation panel, other than the decision to invite the
plaintiff, has not arrived at any other conclusion in respect of the
investigation of the activities of the CBN for the financial year of
2011 and 2012. So the FRCN urges the court to strike out the suit for
being misconceived and premature”.
Justice James Tsoho adjourned till 12th May 2014 to deliver judgment on the suit.
No comments:
Post a Comment